USDC users are again asking whether Circle should offer a clearer recovery process for mistaken token transfers.
Summary
- USDC users are questioning Circle’s recovery options after claims of mistaken transfers to inaccessible contracts.
- Tether’s official recovery page says some mistaken USDT deposits may be reviewed case by case.
- Tether freezes far more stablecoin value than Circle across blacklist cases globally.
The debate followed posts from users who said they sent USDC to addresses or contracts they could not access.
One user, Weilin Li, asked on X whether Circle provides a service similar to Tether’s token recovery process after sending USDC to a self-deployed contract.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT replied that recovery may be technically possible in some cases involving native USDC, but he also criticized Circle’s approach. His comment was an opinion posted on X, not an official finding.
Circle terms warn transfers can be final
Circle’s USDC terms state that once a transaction has been initiated, it cannot be reversed, except as set out in the terms. The company also says USDC transactions are generally nonrefundable.
The same terms warn that sending USDC to a wallet or address that does not support USDC can lead to permanent loss. Circle also says it bears no responsibility for losses from sending USDC to unsupported addresses.
Circle still has address control tools in some cases. Its terms say the company may block certain USDC addresses and freeze related USDC if it links the address to illegal activity or a breach of its rules. Circle also says USDC follows its blocklisting policy.
Tether recovery policy draws comparison
Tether’s official recovery page says Tether token recovery is a process for returning mistakenly deposited Tether tokens. The page warns that sending tokens to the wrong destination can still cause a total loss.
Tether says it may try to help in specific cases at its sole discretion. Its examples include certain contracts that do not correctly support withdrawals, token operation contracts, or other destinations Tether decides may be recoverable.
That difference is central to the current debate. Users are not asking for normal blockchain transfers to be reversed. They are asking whether a stablecoin issuer can freeze trapped tokens and reissue new tokens after identity checks and proof of error.
Crypto.news data shows different issuer behavior
Crypto.news reported that Tether froze about $3.3 billion between 2023 and 2025, compared with about $109 million frozen by Circle. The report said Tether used a freeze, burn, and reissue model in some cases, while Circle mainly acted under court or regulatory orders.
A later report said Tether froze over $514 million USDT across 370 addresses in 30 days, with its 2025 blacklist total reaching $1.26 billion.
Circle has also faced criticism from ZachXBT in other cases. Crypto.news reported in April that he accused Circle of failing to freeze stolen USDC during the Drift Protocol exploit.
No Comment! Be the first one.